7
Members received and considered the Planning Manager's report which sought approval of a change of use from hotel to house in multiple occupation with managed accommodation.
The Planning Manager reported that the application site was situated on the eastern side of Queens Road, Great Yarmouth and was largely situated amongst residential uses, but with more mixed use on Nelson Road South further to the east.
The application submitted was to change the use of a hotel to a 12 bed House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) in use class Sui genris with managers accommodation. The Planning Manager reported that the application was a retrospective application and has been used as a HMO since 2015.
The Planning Manager reported that no objections had been received in respect of the application.
Members were reminded that this was the third application since the use started in 2015, the previous two applications had been refused by the Committee and had both been appealed, it was noted that both previous appeals had been dismissed in view of the planning inspector agreeing with the Council that the communal facilities were inadequate. The Planning Manager reported that the Planning Inspector's decision for the previous applications needed to be considered in the determination of this application whereby the principle of use of the building as an HMO had been deemed acceptable, although the appeal had been dismissed due to the layout of communal facilities being inadequate, it was pointed out that the latest application layout clearly defined areas of communal use therefore it was felt that concerns raised over living condition had been suitable resolved.
The Planning Manager reported that the application was recommended for approval, subject to all conditions ensuring a suitable development, ensuring the creation and retention of communal facilities, the provision of a flood response plan and noise assessment.
Members raised concern in that the application site had continuously been used as a HMO following two refusals by the Committee. The Planning Manager advised that the Planning Officers had been working with the applicant in order to produce a suitable option for consideration.
Some concern was raised in relation to the layout, it was pointed out that the basement had not previously been included for use but had been proposed in the current layout, all other proposed layout remained the same as previous.
A Member asked whether room sizes as detailed within the layout included the WC facilities, and it was advised that these were not included, Members were provided with measurements.
A Member raised concern in relation to Paragraph 4.1 within the report where a mixed area with tourism uses had been mentioned as it was felt that tourism was not prevalent to the number of HMO's in the area.
A Member asked how as Members a certainty could be put in place that the property would not be used as a bedsit, the Planning Manager advised that a condition could be imposed and that the property could be monitored in conjunction with the Environmental Health Team.
A Member raised concern in relation to the proliferation of HMO's in the area and the issues relating to parking within the area and the gradual erosion of prime holiday area. A further Member reiterated the concerns and stated that in his opinion there was a need to look at future sustainability and encourage development in other areas.
The Planning Officer reminded Members that the Planning inspector had commented that it was a suitable area for a HMO property. A Member stated the need for good quality rental properties in the area and felt that clusters of HMOs should not be encouraged.
RESOLVED :
That application 06/18/0345/CU be refused in view of the proliferation of HMO's in the area and the impact, appearance and condition of living facilities as proposed.