Apologies for absence were received from Councillor A Grey.

The Chairman declared a Personal Interest in Item number 6, but in line with the Council's Constitution was allowed to both speak and vote on the matter.

The minutes of the meeting held on 14 December 2016 were confirmed.

There were no matters arising from the above minutes.

The Committee received and considered the comprehensive report from the Planning Group Manager.

The Planning Group Manager reported that outline planning permission which established the principle of development on the site was granted in 2014. The A143/A12 link road had been completed for the most part and the site was one of the Council's two identified strategic sites for development in the Core Strategy adopted in December 2015. the outline planning permission was subject to a number of conditions covering a range of matters and the Section 106 agreement covered the whole site.

The Planning Group Manager reported that the house types in Phase 2 comprised a good mix of dwelling types. When considered in the context of the site as a whole, the house types were consistent with the Core Strategy policy to seek a range of house types to address all needs on new developments. Affordable housing in this section amounted 22 units.

The Planning Group Manager reported that Local Highways issues had been addressed in negotiation with Norfolk County Council, subject to conditions. Highways England had reiterated their conditions imposed on the outline planning permission and work was currently underway in association with Highways England, to carry out alteration and improvement to the A12/Beaufort Way roundabout.

The Planning Group Manager reported that the letter of objection from a local resident largely related to Phase 3, and a planning application for this phase had not been submitted. However, at the last meeting regarding planning permission for houses on Site 25, nine letters of objection had been received which were pertinent to this application citing over-development of site, devaluation of their properties due to the proximity of social housing and terraced housing.

The Planning Group Manager reported that the original outline application addressed a number of issues raised by Natural England and subject to conditions and the requirements in the section 106 agreement raised no objection to the application.

The Planning Group Manager reported that the consultation response to the application, as originally submitted, i.e Phases 2 and 6, highlighted the need to balance the requirements to create safe and secure living environment with sustainable pedestrian/cycle friendly developments.

The Planning Group Manager reported that the consultation response from Bradwell Parish Council highlighted the concern regarding foul sewerage and the ability of the Morton Crescent pumping station to accept more foul flows. The submitted application indicated that the drainage strategy directed foul water to the Oriel Avenue connection, and not, Morton Crescent. The Planning Group Manager recommended that a condition was imposed on the decision notice regarding the foul sewerage being directed to Oriel Avenue, to alleviate the Parish Council's concerns.

The Planning Group Manager reported that with regard to surface water disposal, that Norfolk County Council, as the lead flood authority , were satisfied that Phase 2 disposal of surface water via the on site sustainable drainage system had been addressed, and together with the conditions required by the Highway Authority regarding highway drainage, ensured that surface water drainage had been appropriately considered. The applicants had submitted revised details to address the concerns raised by the LLFA in regard to surface water drainage in Phase 6. The applicants have therefore requested that the application be modified to remove Phase 6 from the application and only Phase 2 is to be considered by the Committee.

The Planning Group Manager reported that this application related to matters of detail and not the principle of development, which had already been accepted, following the grant of outline planning permission which established the principle of development for 700 residential dwellings. The outline application together with the application for full planning permission for 150 dwellings and related legal agreement dealt with the impact upon local infrastructure such as schools and highways and was not to be revisited.

The Planning Group Manager reported that this reserved matter application was recommended for approval, subject to conditions referred to in the report for Phase 2 only, in accordance with the amended application. The application was considered to comply with the terms of the outline application, subject to the conditions on the outline planning permission and the signed legal agreement, and in compliance with Policy CS18 of the Core Strategy adopted December 2015.

A Member reported that a percentage of the proposed houses would be affordable housing which were different to Housing Association properties and which were much needed in the Borough.

A Member asked if a condition could be placed on any grant of planning permission to ensure that the development would not connect on to the Morton Crescent pumping station. The Chairman requested that the applicant should put this in writing to the Parish Council and the Council. The Planning Group Manager agreed to put this request to the applicant.

The Chairman asked whether a condition could be imposed that no building works to commence on site until Anglian Water had upgraded the sewerage infrastructure. The Chairman reported that he was disappointed that Persimmon had not sent a representative to the meeting  to answer the Committee's concerns.

A Member reported that Anglian Water were due to start work to upgrade the Morton Crescent pumping station at the end of January, as a result of cross-party working. The Chairman reported that he was very concerned for the residents of Bradwell who had been suffering form sewerage problems since 1966.

RESOLVED:

That Reserved Matters application number 06/16/0064/D be approved subject to the conditions referred to in the report for Phase 2 only, in accordance with the amended application from the applicants. The application was considered to comply with the terms of the outline application, subject to the conditions on the outline planning permission and the signed legal agreement and in compliance with Policy CS18 of the Core strategy adopted in December 2015. The applicant to write to the Parish Council giving assurance of the sewerage infrastructure for Phase 2.

The Committee received and considered the comprehensive report from the Planning Group Manager.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the application site was to the rear of Yarmouth Road, Hemsby and was accessed through the existing property, Peacehaven, which was proposed for demolition.The site was behind the properties at Old Thatche Close and Easterly Way. The site was currently used as a rear garden for Peacehaven and was cleared at the time of the site visit. The site was adjacent (but outside of) the village development limit on the northern and western boundary.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the application was for full permission for the demolition of the existing property and the erection of 12 bungalows. An outline application for 8 dwellings was approved by Committee for this site, only the access was agreed as a reserved matter, meaning the layout and design would need approval. The decision had not yet been issued as a Section 106 agreement had not been signed.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the Parish Council objected on the grounds of over-development of the site. Highways had withdrawn their objection as the road was now proposed as private, subject to suitable road management and provision of off-site footway improvements. The Senior Planning Officer reported that 11 objections from 8 objectors had been received and Councillor Bensly, Ward Councillor, had commented on site levels and working drainage provision, boundary treatments and an assessment of trees on site.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that 2 affordable units or equivalent contributions would be required and a s106 agreement would be required and the nature of the affordable allocation would be discussed with the Housing Team.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the layout of the site was relatively dense towards the northern half of the development.It was recognised that the properties in the north west of the site were more clustered and closer to adjacent boundaries.it was for the Committee to determine whether the loss of amenities was significantly detrimental. Mitigation measures could include appropriate boundary treatments to reduce potential overlooking, and conditions ensuring the properties were single storey and removing permitted rights with regard to dormers and roof extensions could be imposed to reduce the potential of overlooking. In addition, only a single window looks northwards from the Type C properties, which could be obscured glazing.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that Environmental Health were concerned about potential burning of materials on the site.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the application was recommended for approval subject to conditions ensuring a suitable development and a s106 agreement regarding affordable housing.

Councillor Bensly, Ward Councillor, addressed the Committee and reiterated the concerns of the residents who resided in Easterly Way to the application.

Mrs Ellis, Parish Councillor, reported the concerns of the Parish Council to the Committee.

RESOLVED:

That application number 06/16/0462/F be approved subject to conditions ensuring a suitable development. These include, but are not limited to; drainage conditions, boundary treatments, access details and off-site footpath improvements, limits to extensions and sizes, appropriate obscure glazing. the approval is subject to a s106 agreement regarding affordable housing.

The Committee received and considered the comprehensive report from the Planning Group Manager.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the application site was located to the northern end of Mill Road, Cobholm, and was adjacent to the western and north western boundary of a play area. To the north eastern boundary, there was a caravan park with a number of static caravans on site.The site had previously been used as a lorry trailer park and had been classed as commercial use for over 30 years.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the application site was located within Flood Zone Three and was accompanied by a flood risk assessment. There were no highways objections as the revised plans had removed the visitor parking at the site but retained a garage and driveway parking to each property. The site was in a sustainable location close to local facilities such as shops, recreation areas and schools. It was located within affordable housing sub-market area 3, and was as such, under the threshold to provide affordable housing. There was no open space/children's play area provision on site so a contribution in line with policy would be sought for payment in lieu of on-site provision.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the proposed dwellings were designed to be three storey with a pitched roof and although partially visible would not look unduly imposing or have a significant effect on the character of the surrounding area, with specific reference to the Broads.

The Senior Planning Officer reported that the application was recommended for approval as it complied with Policies CS2 and CS13 of the Great Yarmouth  Local Plan, Core Strategy, saved Policy HOU7 of the Great Yarmouth Boroughwide Local Plan and the NPPF and subject to a s106 agreement.

A Member asked for clarification that each property had two parking spaces. The Senior Planning Officer reported that one car would be able to park in the garage with one car on the driveway in front of the garage.

A Member asked for clarification regarding the Affordable Housing allocation for the application. The Senior Planning Officer reported that the Affordable Housing threshold was higher for developments in Great Yarmouth Zone 3.

RESOLVED:

That application number 06/16/0431/F be approved as the proposal complied with Policies CS2 and CS13 of the Great Yarmouth Local Plan: Core Strategy, saved Policy HOU7 of the Great Yarmouth Boroughwide Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework. Any permission shall be subject to a s106 agreement for all appropriate contributions. Conditions shall be attached to any approval which shall include all conditions requested by consulted parties and all conditions required to ensure an adequate form of development; Flood Evacuation Plan, Public Open Space and Soakaway provision via Anglian Water. 

The Committee received and considered the comprehensive report from the Planning Group Manager.

The Planning Officer reported that planning permission was being sought for the siting of a mobile home on the westerly edge of the central green area of the site. This area had previously been developed, as the toilet and laundry block had been roughly sited in this location.The proposed caravan with associated concrete hard standing had been sited in this position without planning consent. Skirting, boundary treatment and parking provision would need to be agreed subject to planning approval. The caravan was set away from the nearby group of trees which were covered by TPO No.1 2009. The scale and massing of the caravan was significantly less than that of the permitted permanent dwelling. The separation distance was considered adequate to maintain privacy in both the proposed mobile home and that of existing residents and would not result in loss of amenity.

The Planning Officer reported that two letters of objection had been received from local residents.

The Planning Officer reported that the application was recommended for approval as it accorded with Plociy CS1 and CS2 of the Great Yarmouth Local Plan - Core Strategy and saved Policy HOU7, HOU15 and HOU16 of the Great Yarmouth Boroughwide Local Plan and the requested conditions.

A Member reported that he was disappointed that the Planning Inspector had allowed the appeal.

Members were minded to refuse the application. However, Councillor Wainwright reported that the applicant had permission to site 28 units on the application site and that this application was for be the 28th unit. The applicant had already won an appeal and costs had been awarded against the Council, so if this application was refused, the applicant would more than likely go to appeal again and the Council, on the probability of balance, would loose again and have more costs awarded against it.

As Members did not have this information to hand in the agenda report and in light of the new information, it was RESOLVED:

That application number 06/16/0752/F be approved as the proposal was considered to accord with Policy CS1 and CS2 of the Great Yarmouth Local Plan Core Strategy and saved Policies HOU7 and HOU15 of the Great Yarmouth Boroughwide Local Plan. To approve subject to conditions requiring additional information to be submitted and approved by the local planning authority regarding the provision for on-site parking spaces for two cars, details of boundary treatment and position and measures to protect the protected trees.

The Committee noted the planning applications cleared under delegated powers and by the Development Control Committee from 1 - 30 December 2016.

The Planning Group Manager reported the outcome of the appeal regarding Land adjacent Briarcroft, Porters Lane, Burgh Castle and the comments made by the Inspector regarding the provision of a 5 year supply of building land and the necessity for the Council to sort their housing allocations as a matter of urgency.

The Committee moved the following resolution;

"That under Section 100(A)(4) of the Local Government Act 1972, the public be excluded from the meeting for the following item of business on the grounds that it involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 1 of Part I of Schedule 12(A) of the said Act."