06
The Executive Director - Resources reported that this report presents the 2025/26 budget for the General Fund and Housing Revenue Account for approval including the capital programme for both.
The 2025/26 medium term financial strategy was presented to Members in December 2024 and at that time set a savings/income target of £1.5million for the 2025/26 financial year, with a further £1.5million target in 2026/27 and £1 million in 2027/28. This along with a reducing reliance on the use of reserves over the short term was part of the financial strategy to produce a balanced budget for 2025/26. This was ahead of the detailed work on the service budgets and the outcome of the finance settlement. As part of the approval of the MTFS members approved savings and additional income totalling £583,500 which had been considered as part of cross party budget meetings to inform the budget.
The provisional Local Government Financial Settlement for 2025/26 was announced on 18 December 2024. The final settlement is due to be confirmed in early February and any changes will be updated as part of the budget reports to Members in February. The provisional settlement followed the publication of the Local Government Finance Policy Statement 2025/26 announced at the end of November.
The Council must present for approval a balanced budget each year. Despite the slightly improved finance settlement for 2025/26 above the level previously forecast the budget is reliant on the use of reserves as it would be in the medium term. This is not a sustainable position for the long term and when the outcomes of the future funding review are known this will assist Local Authorities with the longer-term financial planning for the provision of services and the MTFS will be updated accordingly.
The budget report will be presented for approval by Council on 20 February 2025 to inform the setting of the council tax for 2025/26.
The report and appendices present the detailed budget considerations for 2025/26.
Whilst the report presents a budget for 2025/26 for approval only it does flag a funding gap of £1.1 million in 2026/27 for which early work will commence on addressing this gap in 2025/26 and be informed by the funding reforms for local government.
Councillor Wainwright reported that he would not comment fully to the Budget at this meeting and would save his questions for full Council next Thursday. However, he had attended Cabinet this afternoon and was concerned that Cabinet had reinstated Ward Budgets at £2k per Councillor which totalled £78k without consulting the cross-party Member Working Group. As a result of the Council receiving a favourable settlement from the Labour Government, it would appear that the current Conservative administration had no qualms in regard to taking more money from our reserves.
Councillor Wainwright was also concerned that the budget for lifeguard provision had been reinstated in the budget. Councillor Wainwright asked the Executive director if she had been made aware of these two amendments prior to Cabinet. The Executive Director reported that she was not aware of the amendment to reinstate ward budgets but the lifeguard provision continued to be reviewed in order for this service to be retained.
The Chair reported that the Council had received extra funding of £470k to combat deprivation, a 2.7% rise in the Support Grant. The Chair was disappointed that several members of his Group had sat on the Member Working Group and had not been consulted on the two amendments proposed at Cabinet and that the S151 Officer was unaware of these proposals. Councillor Jeal reported that he was also disappointed that the MWH had not been consulted.
Councillor Thompson asked whether the Council were still in negotiation with GYBID in regard to the funding of the lifeguard provision. The Executive Director reported that the lines of communication remained open but that the Council were not hopeful as the BID had allocated all of their funding for the next financial year.
Councillor Thompson asked if the costs of Devolution would have to be borne by the Council. The Executive director reported that £200k had been allowed in the budget for Devolution/LGR. Although this amount had been earmarked, if the monies were not spent, it would go back into Reserves.
The Executive Director reported on the additional costs for the IDB final settlement, one-off funding for additional costs for 2024-25 had been received but the allocation for 2025-26 had not been announced and whether there would be any further support from the Government. However, the IDB charges for 2025-26 would fall within the ball-park figure included in our budget whilst we awaited the allocation.
RESOLVED:-
That the Committee note the report.