5
The Committee received and considered the report from the Planning Officer.
The Planning Officer reported that his application was brought before the Committee because the applicant was an employee of the Council. The application sought the removal of an existing hedgerow and erection of a 1.8m high wooden fence.
The Planning Officer reported that the main planning issues for consideration included:-
• Impact on character of the area
• Design
• Impact upon Highway trees
• Residential amenity
• Highways Impact
The Planning Officer reported that having considered the details provided, the application was considered to comply with Core Strategy policies CS9 and CS11, and Local Plan Part 2 policies A1 and E4 and there were no material considerations to suggest the development should not be approved as it was considered to be consistent with these policies.
The Planning Officer reported that it was recommended that application 06/22/0731HH be approved subject to the conditions as set out in the agenda report and including two new conditions; conditions 6 & 7, as reported at the meeting. The Planning Officer also drew members attention to condition number 4 which had also been amended.
Councillor Williamson commented that it was sad to see hedgerows being removed when at the same time, the intention was to encourage more greenery as per discussions on the new design code for new developments. He added that it was vital that the two cherry trees were protected by a TPO.
Councillor B Wright agreed with Councillor Williamson that removing the hedgerow was a real shame as it would affect the amenity of the area and the street scene.
The Planning Officer confirmed that the applicant was within their rights to remove the hedgerow without permission and its retention could not be enforced. The Development Manager clarified that the installation of alternative fencing could be carried out without planning permission for up to 1 metre in height.
Councillor B Walker suggested that the removal of the hedgerow could not be prevented by planning law, but it was still most regrettable.
Councillor P Hammond proposed that the officer recommendation together with the conditions as laid out in the agenda report be approved, amended condition number 4 and additional conditions 6 & 7 as reported at the meeting. This was seconded by Councillor Flaxman-Taylor.
Following a vote, it was RESOLVED:-
That application number 06/22/0731/HH be approved subject to the conditions as set out in the agenda report, amended condition number 4 and additional conditions numbers 6 & 7 as reported at the meeting.
1. The development must be begun not later than three years beginning with the date of this permission.
The reason for the condition is: - Required to be imposed pursuant to Section 51 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
2. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the application form and following plans received on 16 August 2022:-
Location Plan - site plan (1-1250)
Proposed site plan (1-50)
Proposed Fence Type
The reason for the condition is: -
For the avoidance of doubt:
3. The fence shall be installed and constructed using the following method:-
1. A 200mm square by 300mm deep Inspection/test hole will be dug in each location where the fence posts are intended to be located; this is to establish if any tree rootsare present and to avoid damaging them.
2. If any tree roots are discovered, works shall temporarily cease and photos of the roots will be sent to the Arboricultural Officer for review before any further works within the trees Root Protection Area (RPA) are undertaken. If the Arboricultural Officer deems it necessary they shall attend site before works re-commence, to assess if the unearthed roots are vital to the tree (structural or fibrous). If this is the case, at the instruction of the Arboricultural Officer, the post location will be moved accordingly, and another inspection/test hole will be dug to establish possible root location.
3. Following inspection/test holes being dug and showing that no roots are present, an impervious membrane shall be installed within each post hole to contain and prevent concrete leaching outside the post hole.
4. Fence posts will be concreted into the minimum possible depth required -to a maximum depth of 300mm below existing surface of the soil.
5. Fence Panels shall be 8ft or 10ft wide (Depending on availability) where feasible and practicable to lessen the number of posts needed within the RPA of the tree to limit the amount of disturbance caused to the tree's root plate. The reason for the condition is: -
To ensure that no harm is done to existing trees within the highway boundary in accordance with Local Plan Part 2 Policy E4.
6. Prior to installation, full details of the colour of the fence shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be carried out in accordance with the approved details.
The reason for the condition is: -
In the interests of the visual amenities of the area as precise details of the materialshave not been submitted, in accordance with Core Strategy Policy CS9 and Local Plan
Part 2 Policy A1.
7. No part of the proposed structure (the fence, its posts and their foundations) shall overhang or encroach upon highway land and no gate shall open outwards over the highway.
The reason for the condition is: -
In the interests of highway safety.
And any other conditions considered appropriate by the Development Manager.
Informative Notes:-
Application Reference: 06/22/0731/HH Committee Date: 09 November 2022 1. It is the Applicant's responsibility to clarify the boundary with the public highway. Private structures such as fences, or walls will not be permitted on highway land. The highway boundary may not match the applicant's title plan. For further details please contact the highway research team at highway.boundaries@norfolk.gov.uk.
And any other informatives considered appropriate by the Development Manager.