04
A presentation was given to the Committee by Debbie Hanson and Larisa Midoni (EY).
Debbie gave a brief overview of the report and outlined the different sections including work completed, results and findings, and value for money reporting.
Debbie advised that significant progress has been made with sets of accounts being published between October 2024 and February 2025. However, as a result of the disclaimer of opinion on the 2023/24 financial statements, EY did not have assurance over the brought forward balances from 2023/24. This means they do not have assurances over the 2024/25 in-year movements and the comparative prior year movements or assurance over the 2023/24 comparative balances disclosed in the 2024/25 financial statements. It was therefore anticipated that a disclaimed 2024/25 audit opinion would be issued. However, they have started to build assurance.
Debbie drew Members’ attention to the Executive Summary and advised that the overall materiality assessment had been updated to £2 million.
Four risks of significant weakness had been identified: arrangement for production of the Council’s statement of accounts; the Council’s counter fraud and corruption framework; arrangements for contract management and arrangements for the managements of accounts receivable. In addition, four additional VFM risks and four significant weakness had been identified.
It was also advised that the Annual Governance Statement does not clearly and adequately reflect all significant governance issues. It has been requested that management make changes to the AGS to address this.
She also set out EY’s observations in relation to the areas of audit focus and drew attention to a new risk: risk of impairment of investments in Equinox subsidiaries in the Council’s single entity accounts. However, there was not enough time for the supporting information to be audited before the backstop date.
Debbie also advised that immediate steps should be taken to strengthen the governance, design and operational effectiveness of internal controls. She recommended that the control environment is strengthened; the monitoring and follow-up of Internal Audit findings is improved; training and resources for control owners at service levels is increased and collaboration between management and Internal Audit is strengthened.
Members were advised of the timescale for the process of re-building assurance set out in the NAO’s Local Audit Reset and Recovery Implementation Guidance (LARRIG). The Council is currently behind the schedule due to disclaimed opinions. The gap in assurance is larger than a single year and it is unlikely that 2026/27 will be an unqualified opinion.
Members received an update from Larisa Midoni (EY) regarding the VFM arrangements. Two risks of significant weakness were identified: continuity and quality of corporate risk management arrangements and that contract management arrangements are inadequate. The Corporate Risk Officer post became vacant in June 2025 but has now been filled. Clearance has now been received from Internal Audit on two out of nine recommendations related to contract management arrangements with a third expected imminently.
Significant improvements have been made in the council’s arrangements for producing the statement of accounts. No significant weaknesses have been identified in the quality and compliance of Council housing services and arrangements are in place to address the recommendations relating to arrangements over the governance of the Council’s subsidiaries. There is no longer a significant weakness in arrangements for the management of accounts receivable.